Case 1306014/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss B Knight v Lamoda Fashion Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1306014/2020
- Decision date
- 11 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Flood Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss B Knight
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Miss B Knight against Lamoda Fashion Ltd. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered it to pay £770 gross.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £350 in damages. In addition, it found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £280 gross. The judgment states that the sums under paragraphs 1 to 3 were to be paid gross, with the claimant responsible for any income tax and employee national insurance contributions.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £770 gross under paragraph 1 of the Rule 21 judgment. | Upheld | — | £770 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £350 under paragraph 2. | Upheld | — | £350 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £280 gross under paragraph 3. | Upheld | — | £280 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,400
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.