Case 1306018/2024 · Employment Tribunal
MRS SRIUTHAI PLANT v Andrew Moseley — 2026
- Case reference
- 1306018/2024
- Decision date
- 3 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge N. Clarke Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MRS SRIUTHAI PLANT
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningFollowing a hearing in Birmingham on 20 and 21 May 2026, the tribunal found Mrs Sriuthai Plant's claims against Andrew Moseley for unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal well-founded. It awarded £1,040.64 for unfair dismissal and £602.35 for wrongful dismissal. These awards total £1,642.99; the judgment did not identify separate basic and compensatory components.
The holiday pay claim was not well-founded and was dismissed. The age discrimination claim was dismissed on withdrawal. Summary reasons were given orally at the hearing; the written judgment records the outcomes and awards without setting out the underlying factual findings or legal reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The award was not divided into basic and compensatory components. | Upheld | — | £1,041 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £602 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,643
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.