Case 1306071/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Little Men and Misses Day Nursery — 2020
- Case reference
- 1306071/2019
- Decision date
- 28 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kelly Appearances
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 28 February 2020 at Midlands West Employment Tribunal, Employment Judge Kelly gave oral reasons and held that the claimant’s claims were dismissed because the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to consider them. The stated reason was that the claimant had not presented her claims in time.
The judgment does not record any findings on the merits of the underlying claims. It records only the jurisdictional decision, so no substantive determination was made about the alleged unfair dismissal, breach of contract, or disability discrimination matters.
No monetary award was made. The judgment is confined to the time limit point and the resulting dismissal of the proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed on jurisdictional grounds because the Tribunal found the claim was presented out of time and therefore could not be considered. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed on jurisdictional grounds because the Tribunal found the claim was presented out of time and therefore could not be considered. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed on jurisdictional grounds because the Tribunal found the claim was presented out of time and therefore could not be considered. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.