Case 1306072/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Bronze (counsel) For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1306072/2019
- Decision date
- 31 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mrs B Hicks, Mr C Ledbury
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr L Bronze (counsel) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the final merits hearing in Birmingham on 22-26, 29 and 30 March 2021, before Employment Judge Perry with lay members Mrs B Hicks and Mr C Ledbury, the tribunal disposed of three claims brought by Mr Patrick Molloy against ASDA Stores Limited. The written judgment records that the victimisation complaint under s.27 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed on withdrawal, and that the direct discrimination complaint was dismissed.
The tribunal also dismissed the unfair dismissal complaint, stating that it was not well founded. The written record does not set out the oral reasons in detail and does not record any monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | The judgment records that the victimisation complaint under s.27 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant was not directly discriminated against contrary to s.13 and Part 5 Equality Act 2010. The extracted text does not itself specify the protected characteristic; race is inferred from the case listing context. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment says the unfair dismissal complaint was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.