Case 1306076/2019 · Employment Tribunal
LEIGH THOMAS v Midland Heart Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1306076/2019
- Decision date
- 31 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McCluggage Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
LEIGH THOMAS
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Birmingham Employment Tribunal on 31 January 2020 before Employment Judge McCluggage. Mr Probert appeared for the claimant and Mr Wort for the respondent. The judgment records that the parties agreed no applications for costs would be made in the case.
The tribunal then stated that the case was dismissed upon withdrawal. The short judgment contains no findings on the underlying merits of any claim and records no monetary award or remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records that the case was dismissed upon withdrawal. The public listing for the case identifies public interest disclosure, but the short judgment does not set out separate merits findings. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the case was dismissed upon withdrawal. The public listing for the case identifies unfair dismissal, but the short judgment does not set out separate merits findings. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.