Case 1306078/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Robert Crutchley v Ice Telecommunications Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1306078/2020
- Decision date
- 7 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Steward Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Robert Crutchley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningRobert Crutchley brought a claim for unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of commission payments said to be due between 7 April 2020 and 21 December 2020, totalling about £25,433.59. Employment Judge Steward held that the commission arrangement arose under a deed of introduction and sale of goodwill dated 17 October 2018, which was separate from the contract of employment dated 8 October 2018.
The tribunal found that the deed was not a contract of employment. It noted that the commission scheme was already in place when the deed was signed and that, for the purposes of the deed, the claimant did not meet the definition of a worker under section 230(3)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. On that basis, the claim did not fall within section 13(1) of the Act.
The tribunal also held that the commission was not wages within section 27(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 because it was not earned in the course of the employment contract and was not payable under the subsisting contract of employment. The tribunal said the duties under the employment contract had nothing to do with the commission payable under the deed, and that the commission remained part of the deed even if the claimant had failed to take up employment under the contract.
The claim for commission was therefore dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim concerned commission payments from 7 April 2020 to 21 December 2020 totalling about £25,433.59. The tribunal held the commission arose under a separate deed of introduction and sale of goodwill, not under the contract of employment, and therefore was not wages for the purpose of an unlawful deduction claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.230(3) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.27(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.13(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.