Case 1306101/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Janusz (Employment Adviser) For v Mr A Forrest (HR Adviser) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1306101/2019
- Decision date
- 10 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gaskell
- Panel members
- Mr RW White, Mr D Faulconbridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Janusz (Employment Adviser) For
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms P Muszynska, brought a complaint of direct disability discrimination against UK-NSI Company Limited. The tribunal sat in Birmingham before Employment Judge Gaskell with Mr RW White and Mr D Faulconbridge as members. The judgment states that the tribunal's decision was unanimous.
The tribunal found that the respondent did not, at any time material to the claim, act towards the claimant in contravention of section 39 of the Equality Act 2010. On that basis, the claimant's complaint of direct disability discrimination, brought pursuant to section 120 of the Act, was dismissed. No monetary award was made. Written reasons were not provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing, subject to any timely request for written reasons.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found that the respondent did not, at any time material to the claim, act in contravention of section 39 of the Equality Act 2010. The claimant's complaint of direct disability discrimination under section 120 was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.