Case 1306107/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Derbyshire v Tower 23 Ltd t/a Pizza Hut — 2021
- Case reference
- 1306107/2019
- Decision date
- 5 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Derbyshire
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Birmingham, before Employment Judge Miller, heard the claimant's complaint that he had been unfairly dismissed by Tower 23 Ltd t/a Pizza Hut. The judgment records that the claimant was represented in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The tribunal found that the claimant's claim that he was unfairly dismissed for asserting a statutory right, pursuant to section 104 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, was well founded and succeeded. No other claims are identified in the judgment extract.
Remedy was not determined in this judgment. The tribunal directed that remedy would be decided at a further hearing listed for 29 July 2021.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant's dismissal was for asserting a statutory right under section 104 Employment Rights Act 1996. Remedy was left to a later hearing on 29 July 2021. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 104 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.