Case 1306107/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Bojarski and v Andrzej Igielski t/a Andrews Garden Services — 2021
- Case reference
- 1306107/2020
- Decision date
- 26 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Choudry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Bojarski and
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented claims on 8 June 2020 including unfair dismissal, holiday pay, notice pay, arrears of pay and other payments. By a judgment dated 18 November 2021, the unfair dismissal claim was struck out because the claimant had been employed for less than two years.
The final hearing took place on 26 November 2021 before Employment Judge Choudry. The claimant did not attend, although the respondent attended in person. The tribunal telephoned the claimant on the numbers provided and left a message asking him to make urgent contact, but no response was received. The tribunal was satisfied that the claimant had adequate notice of the hearing and that all practicable enquiries had been made to identify the reason for his absence.
No documents, witness statements or contract were before the tribunal. The respondent said the claimant was engaged on a self-employed basis rather than as an employee or worker, placing the burden on the claimant to establish employment status. In the claimant's absence, the tribunal said it was not able to proceed substantively with the remaining claims.
The claims for holiday pay, notice pay, arrears of pay and other payments were dismissed under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out by the judgment dated 18 November 2021 because the claimant had been employed for less than two years. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records dismissal of the claims for notice pay and other payments on 26 November 2021. The tribunal did not proceed substantively because the claimant did not attend, no documents or witness statements were produced, and the respondent said the claimant was engaged on a self-employed basis. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records dismissal of the claims for holiday pay and arrears of pay on 26 November 2021. The claimant failed to attend and the tribunal proceeded under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.