Case 1306110/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Norris v Rwt Commercial Services Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1306110/2020
- Decision date
- 21 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harding Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Norris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered Mr J Norris’s complaint of unfair dismissal against Rwt Commercial Services Limited. It recorded that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have at least two years’ service to bring an unfair dismissal complaint.
The tribunal found that Mr Norris had been employed for less than two years. It therefore held that he was not entitled to bring the unfair dismissal complaint. The tribunal also found that, despite being given the opportunity, he had not given an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out.
The unfair dismissal complaint was accordingly struck out. The judgment stated that the claimant’s other complaints were not affected by this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the claimant had less than two years' service and was therefore not entitled to bring an unfair dismissal complaint under section 108 ERA 1996. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.108 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.