Case 1306120/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Harding v 1) Care Help Line (West Midlands) Ltd (In creditors Voluntary Liquidation) 2) Secretary Of State For Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy — 2019
- Case reference
- 1306120/2018
- Decision date
- 17 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a strike out judgment in the claim brought by Miss K Harding against Care Help Line (West Midlands) Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) and the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. Employment Judge Perry signed the judgment on 17 December 2019, and the reason given was that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The tribunal recorded that by a letter dated 17 September 2019 it had given the claimant an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The claim was therefore struck out under rule 37. No merits findings or remedy were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not restate the underlying substantive claim. The gov.uk listing for this case categorises it as unlawful deduction from wages. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.