Case 1306121/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Clarke v Jaguar Land Rover Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1306121/2019
- Decision date
- 19 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Meichen
- Panel members
- Ms B Astill, Mr M Pearson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Clarke
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Birmingham by CVP before Employment Judge Meichen, Ms B Astill and Mr M Pearson. The claimant was represented by counsel and the respondent by a solicitor.
The judgment records the outcomes only. The claims of direct race discrimination, unfair dismissal, and wrongful dismissal described as notice pay all failed and were dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, with written reasons to be provided only if requested within the stated period.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the direct race discrimination claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the unfair dismissal claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment describes this as wrongful dismissal (notice pay) and records that it failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.