Case 1306122/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Abdel-Malek v Larchwood Care — 2019
- Case reference
- 1306122/2019
- Decision date
- 21 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Abdel-Malek
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short withdrawal judgment in case 1306122/2019 between Mrs A Abdel-Malek and Larchwood Care. It states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, and the decision is dated 21 October 2019 by Employment Judge Butler.
No findings of fact or law on the merits are recorded in the judgment text, and no remedy, liability finding, or tribunal reasoning is set out. The decision therefore reflects procedural dismissal following withdrawal rather than a substantive determination of the dispute.
The underlying claim categories used for database extraction are taken from the case listing information provided alongside the judgment, but the judgment itself does not identify or analyse the claims beyond recording that the proceedings were dismissed after withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The written text does not specify the underlying claim type; this classification follows the gov.uk listing category. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The written text does not specify the underlying claim type; this classification follows the gov.uk listing category. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.