Case 1306132/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Janucz, Advisor For the v Ms Themistocleous, Solicitor & Miss Hadfield, Trainee Solicitor — 2025
- Case reference
- 1306132/2024
- Decision date
- 9 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hughes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Janucz, Advisor For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Birmingham, Employment Judge Hughes recorded that the claimant's victimisation claim was dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of that claim.
The judgment also states that the dismissal of the victimisation claim did not affect the remaining complaints. No remedy or monetary award is recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | The judgment states that the claimant's victimisation claim was dismissed on withdrawal and that this did not affect the remaining complaints. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.