Case 1306146/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Grenda v Thorp Precast Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1306146/2019
- Decision date
- 10 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hughes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Grenda
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal issued a strike-out judgment in Mr S Grenda's case against Thorp Precast Ltd. By letter dated 28/01/2020, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out, because he had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 12/08/2019 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37.
The hearing listed for 17/06/2020 and 18/06/2020 was vacated and did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim was struck out under rule 37 after the claimant failed to comply with the Tribunal's order dated 12/08/2019 and did not make sufficient representations in response to the letter dated 28/01/2020, or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.