Case 1306166/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Y Jackson v Wollaston Office Cleaning Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1306166/2020
- Decision date
- 19 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Jones Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Y Jackson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a claim for unlawful deduction from wages lodged on 11 June 2020. The tribunal recorded that the claimant sought an unspecified amount under £150 and that she remained employed by the respondent, Wollaston Office Cleaning Services Limited.
By an order dated 14 May 2021, the claimant was directed to provide a schedule of loss by 16 June 2021 and a witness statement by 14 July 2021. She did not comply with that order, and she also did not provide a bundle of documents for the hearing as requested by the tribunal.
The claim had been listed for hearing on 27 August 2021 and again on 19 November 2021, but those hearings were postponed. The claimant did not attend the hearing on 14 January 2022, did not contact the tribunal to explain her absence, and did not submit any documents or written representations. The Employment Judge therefore struck out the claim on the basis that it appeared not to be actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was for an unspecified amount under £150. It was struck out because the claimant did not comply with the tribunal's order, did not provide a bundle, and did not attend the hearing or contact the tribunal. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.