Case 1306174/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Ibrahim v DBOI Global Services (UK) Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1306174/2024
- Decision date
- 17 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Battisby Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Ibrahim
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr M Ibrahim, brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against DBOI Global Services (UK) Limited. The tribunal identified section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 as requiring at least two years' service before a claimant can bring an unfair dismissal complaint.
The tribunal found that Mr Ibrahim had been employed for less than two years. On that basis, it held that he was not entitled to bring the complaint. It also recorded that he had been given an opportunity to explain why the complaint should not be struck out, but did not give an acceptable reason.
The judgment therefore struck out the complaint of unfair dismissal. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint was struck out because the claimant had less than two years' service and therefore was not entitled to bring an unfair dismissal complaint. The tribunal also recorded that the claimant did not give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity, why the complaint should not be struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.