Case 1306195/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Abbey (in person) For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 1306195/2019
- Decision date
- 27 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Miss Abbey (in person) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was a temporary agency worker supplied by Staffline to DHL at Jaguar Land Rover’s Solihull site. After an accident at work on 1 October 2018, the dispute concerned whether she was contractually entitled to Accident at Work pay, and whether any failure to pay it amounted to an unlawful deduction of wages. At the hearing, the claimant confirmed that disability discrimination was not being pursued, leaving only the wages claim for determination.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant confirmed at the hearing that disability discrimination was not being pursued. The tribunal found the remaining claim concerned Accident at Work pay, held there was no contractual entitlement to that pay, and found no unpaid sums were withheld by the respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 230(3) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.