Case 1306199/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Mr Williams, Owner — 2025
- Case reference
- 1306199/2024
- Decision date
- 20 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harding Approved
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Midlands West on 20 May 2025, before Employment Judge Harding, dealt with claims brought by Ms Scholes against Freerein Organisation Ltd. The respondent was represented by Mr Williams, owner, and the claimant appeared in person. The tribunal recorded no lay members, and the judgment was issued as a short judgment on the day of the hearing.
The claimant succeeded in her breach of contract claim for unpaid notice pay. The tribunal recorded an agreed damages figure of £2,574 and an agreed offset of £190.08, leaving £2,383.92 payable to the claimant. The claimant also succeeded in her unlawful deduction from wages claim based on non-payment of the National Minimum Wage, and the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay gross wages of £45.76.
The claimant's unpaid holiday pay claim failed and was dismissed. The judgment does not set out any additional legal tests or detailed reasons beyond the stated outcomes and the agreed monetary figures. The bottom-line sums recorded in the judgment produce a total award of £2,429.68.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for unpaid notice pay succeeded. The tribunal recorded an agreed damages figure of £2,574, subject to an agreed offset of £190.08, leaving £2,383.92 payable. | Upheld | — | £2,384 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for non-payment of the National Minimum Wage succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay gross wages of £45.76. | Upheld | — | £46 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holiday pay failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,430
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.