Case 1306255/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1306255/2020
- Decision date
- 25 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claims were heard together at Birmingham Employment Tribunal on 24 and 25 May 2021 before Employment Judge Perry, sitting alone. The parties' names were corrected by agreement and the two claims were consolidated. The respondent was represented by counsel and the claimant appeared in person.
The tribunal found that the claimant's complaint of unlawful deductions from wages, so far as it concerned the failure to pay salary from 1 April 2020 at the correct rate, was well founded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the agreed sum of £800.00 gross.
The claimant's complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was dismissed. The tribunal also dismissed the claimant's remaining complaints of unlawful deductions from wages. No separate award was recorded beyond the agreed £800 gross payment on the successful unlawful deductions complaint.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint concerning the respondent's failure to pay the claimant's salary from 1 April 2020 at the correct rate; the tribunal ordered payment of the agreed sum of £800.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £800 |
| Constructive dismissal | The claimant's complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant's remaining complaints of unlawful deductions from wages were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £800
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.