Case 1306266/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Singh v Euro Communications Distribution Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1306266/2020
- Decision date
- 12 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Connolly Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Singh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Mr G Singh's claim of automatically unfair dismissal by reason of unfair selection for redundancy, brought under s.105(1)(c) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment does not determine the merits of that claim.
The judgment also makes clear that this disposal did not affect Mr Singh's ability to pursue his other claims of automatically unfair dismissal or disability discrimination in the same case. No remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant's claim of automatically unfair dismissal by reason of unfair selection for redundancy contrary to s.105(1)(c) ERA 1996 was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant, so no merits finding was made on this claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.105(1)(c) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.