Case 1306277/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Klimkiewicz v Kanes Foods Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1306277/2019
- Decision date
- 22 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hughes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Klimkiewicz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike-out judgment issued by Employment Judge Hughes on 30 January 2020. The Tribunal recorded that by a letter dated 14 November 2019 it had given the claimant an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued and because the claimant had not replied to the Tribunal's letter of 22 July 2019.
The claimant did not make any written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37. The judgment contains no substantive findings on the underlying merits of the claim and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment only records that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37 for not being actively pursued and for no reply to the Tribunal's letter of 22 July 2019. It does not identify the substantive cause of action. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.