Case 1306304/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Wildmoor Oak Enterprises — 2020
- Case reference
- 1306304/2019
- Decision date
- 7 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kelly Appearances
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs K Stacey’s case against Wildmoor Oak Enterprises was heard at the Midlands West Employment Tribunal on 7 January 2020 before Employment Judge Kelly. The respondent did not appear. The tribunal dismissed the claimant’s claims because it found that it did not have jurisdiction to consider them, as they had not been presented in time.
The judgment does not address the substance of the underlying complaints and records no remedy or award. The outcome was therefore a dismissal on time-limit grounds only.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not separately identify the heads of claim; it states that 'the claimant’s claims' were dismissed because they were presented out of time. The gov.uk case listing categorises the matter as unlawful deduction from wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not separately identify the heads of claim; it states that 'the claimant’s claims' were dismissed because they were presented out of time. The gov.uk case listing categorises the matter as working time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.