Case 1306306/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Jackson v Leidos Innovations UK Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1306306/2020
- Decision date
- 7 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Childe REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Jackson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr L Jackson brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against Leidos Innovations UK Limited. The case was heard at Birmingham by CVP on 5-7 June 2024 before Employment Judge Childe, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Ms Tutin of counsel.
The tribunal’s written judgment records a single outcome: the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed. The written record does not set out the tribunal’s factual findings or legal reasoning in detail because reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The judgment also records that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal rules. No monetary remedy was awarded or recorded in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record states only that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; written reasons were not provided in the record. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.