Case 1306311/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Matthews v Arysta LifeScience GB Ltd PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2020
- Case reference
- 1306311/2019
- Decision date
- 13 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Matthews
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Camp in Birmingham on 13 January 2020. The claimant was Miss M Matthews and the respondent was Arysta LifeScience GB Ltd. The judgment was by consent.
The only complaint recorded in the extracted judgment was a complaint or complaints of sexual orientation discrimination. The tribunal recorded that all and any such complaints were dismissed upon withdrawal pursuant to rule 52.
No remedy, liability reasoning, or substantive findings on the merits are recorded in the extracted text. The judgment therefore reflects a procedural disposal of the sexual orientation discrimination complaints rather than an adjudication on the underlying facts.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sexual orientation discrimination | Judgment by consent records that all and any complaints of sexual orientation discrimination were dismissed upon withdrawal pursuant to rule 52. | Withdrawn | Sexual orientation | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.