Case 1306339/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Jones v Goldby Wealth Management LLP — 2024
- Case reference
- 1306339/2023
- Decision date
- 15 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gidney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Midlands West Employment Tribunals on 6 October 2023. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Gidney determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. On the papers, the tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,970.94 net.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,230.78 gross. The judgment states that the gross amount is to be paid and that the respondent is responsible for deductions of income tax and National Insurance contributions. The total sum payable was £5,201.72.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Damages for breach of contract in respect of notice; amount stated net. | Upheld | — | £1,971 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment stated gross. | Upheld | — | £3,231 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,202
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.