Case 1306355/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Dawodu v 24/7 recruitment DHL/ Lint — 2023
- Case reference
- 1306355/2023
- Decision date
- 28 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Britton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Dawodu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. Before doing so, it wrote to the claimant by letter dated 8 November 2023 and gave her an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because she had not complied with the Tribunal’s orders dated 12 October 2023 and 31 October 2023, and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The judgment records that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal concluded that the claim should be struck out. No substantive findings on the merits and no monetary remedy were recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not identify the substantive claim type(s); it states only that "the claim" was struck out after the claimant did not comply with Tribunal orders dated 12 October 2023 and 31 October 2023 and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.