Case 1306368/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Griffiths v NHS Property Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1306368/2020
- Decision date
- 30 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Platt Representation
- Venue
- By CVP at Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Griffiths
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant resigned on 4 May 2020, giving one month's notice, and alleged that a series of matters cumulatively breached the implied term of trust and confidence, with events during the last week of April 2020 said to be the final straw. The alleged matters included changes to work priorities during the COVID-19 pandemic, COVID-19 training and safety measures, delayed City and Guilds training, lack of appraisal, refusal of requests to purchase annual leave, and the claimant's dealings with his line manager about COVID-19 testing while absent from work.
The Tribunal found that the claimant affirmed the contract by continuing to work normally throughout his notice period, performing the same tasks without objection, not working under protest and not raising a grievance. It also found that, even if there had been no affirmation, the line manager's conduct during the final week of April 2020 did not amount to a repudiatory breach: the manager was seeking to assist with COVID-19 testing arrangements and understand the claimant's ability to attend work, and the claimant had not proved harassment or inappropriate treatment.
Considering the alleged breaches cumulatively, the Tribunal found that they did not amount to conduct calculated or likely to destroy or seriously damage trust and confidence. It accepted that the respondent gave reasonable management instructions, provided adequate COVID-19 training, PPE and risk assessments, arranged the City and Guilds training within a reasonable timeframe, had legitimate business reasons for refusing annual leave purchase requests, and did not treat the claimant differently in relation to appraisals. The constructive dismissal claim was therefore dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes the claim as constructive unfair dismissal brought under section 95(1)(c) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
10 references- s.95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Western Excavating Ltd v Sharp
- implied term of trust and confidence
- Mahmud v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA
- Baldwin v Brighton & Hove City Council
- Lewis v Motorworld Garages Ltd
- London Borough of Waltham Forest v Omilaju
- Kaur v Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
- Malik implied term
- last straw
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.