Case 1306438/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr I N Aimufua, Litigation Consultant — 2025
- Case reference
- 1306438/2024
- Decision date
- 22 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Dimbylow heard the case remotely in Birmingham on 21 and 22 July 2025. The claimant, Mr CS Gandhok, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr I N Aimufua, Litigation Consultant.
The tribunal upheld the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim and declared that he had been unfairly dismissed by Mann Freightways Ltd. It awarded a basic award of £2,022.00, calculated as £674.00 x 1.5 x 2, and a compensatory award of £1,708.68, made up of £1,208.68 for 11 days’ loss of earnings and £500.00 for loss of statutory employment rights. The tribunal recorded that recoupment of benefits did not apply because the claimant had not received state benefits.
The breach of contract claim, based on failure to give notice or payment in lieu of notice, also succeeded. However, the tribunal made no separate damages award because it would have duplicated the compensation already awarded for unfair dismissal. The unlawful deduction from wages claim was upheld and the respondent was ordered to pay £674.00 gross.
The holiday pay claim was dismissed as not well-founded. The tribunal stated that the total payable by the respondent to the claimant was £4,404.68. The written judgment also notes that the basic award figure in the written judgment is the correct figure, correcting a difference from the oral judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal declared the dismissal unfair and awarded a basic award of £2,022.00 and a compensatory award of £1,708.68, making £3,730.68 in total for this claim. It noted that recoupment of benefits did not apply because the claimant had not received state benefits. | Upheld | — | £3,731 |
| Breach of contract | The claim concerned failure to give notice or payment in lieu of notice. It succeeded, but the tribunal made no separate damages award because that would have duplicated the unfair dismissal compensation. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of £674.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £674 |
| Holiday pay | The claim was found not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,405
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,022
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £1,709
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.