Case 1306458/2020 · Employment Tribunal
MR MOHAMMED BUTT v Department of Work and Pensions — 2023
- Case reference
- 1306458/2020
- Decision date
- 10 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ali
- Panel members
- Miss Fritz, Mrs Payne
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MR MOHAMMED BUTT
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a case management judgment made at a hearing on 10 July 2023 before Employment Judge Ali, with Miss Fritz and Mrs Payne sitting as members. The claimant did not attend. The respondent was represented by counsel. The final hearing had been listed for 10 to 14 July 2023, but no merits findings were made at this hearing.
The tribunal ordered the claimant to write to the tribunal and the respondent by 7 August 2023 explaining his failure to attend the final hearing. If he did so, the case was to be relisted for a 3 hour hearing before an Employment Judge sitting alone to consider whether the claims should be struck out and, if appropriate, any further case management orders, including any costs application.
If the claimant did not provide that explanation, the tribunal ordered that his claims would stand automatically struck out under Rule 37(c) and (d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, on the basis that they had not been actively pursued and that he had failed to comply with tribunal orders. The respondent was given liberty to apply for costs if that occurred, with a timetable set for any such application and response.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The tribunal did not decide the merits at this hearing. It directed the claimant to explain his non-attendance by 7 August 2023 and stated that, if he did not do so, the claims would stand automatically struck out under Rule 37(c) and (d). | Other | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal did not determine this claim on the merits at this hearing. It made a conditional case management order: the claimant had to explain his failure to attend the final hearing, failing which the claims would be automatically struck out. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(c) and (d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.