Case 1306463/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Chloe Bryan v Stepping Stones Grange Nursery — 2024
- Case reference
- 1306463/2023
- Decision date
- 11 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Childe Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Chloe Bryan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike out judgment in Miss Chloe Bryan v Stepping Stones Grange Nursery, case number 1306463/2023. The Tribunal recorded that by letter dated 26 January 2024 the claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with Tribunal orders dated 18 October 2023, 26 October 2023 and 7 November 2023, and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make any written representations and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No substantive liability findings or remedy award are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records a strike out under rule 37. The reason given was failure to comply with the Tribunal's orders dated 18 October 2023, 26 October 2023 and 7 November 2023, and that the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.