Case 1306464/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Andrea Millichamp v Shropshire Council — 2024
- Case reference
- 1306464/2023
- Decision date
- 23 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Connolly
- Venue
- West Midlands
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Andrea Millichamp
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, sitting as Employment Judge Connolly alone at West Midlands by video on 21, 22 and 23 August 2024, found that the claimant Ms Andrea Millichamp was unfairly dismissed by the respondent Shropshire Council. Her claim of unfair dismissal succeeded.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant compensation for unfair dismissal in the agreed total sum of £9,731.34, comprising a basic award of £5,297.74 and a compensatory award of £4,433.60 equivalent to notice pay and loss of statutory rights. The Tribunal also recorded a change of the claimant's name to Ms Andrea Millichamp.
Reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and written reasons were not requested, so no written reasons were provided with this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Compensation awarded in agreed total sum, comprising basic award (£5,297.74) and compensatory award equivalent to notice pay and loss of statutory rights (£4,433.60). | Upheld | — | £9,731 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,731
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £5,298
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £4,434
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.