Case 1306486/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Jackson, Counsel For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 1306486/2019
- Decision date
- 28 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dimbylow
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr M Jackson, Counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing held remotely by CVP on 28 October 2020 before Employment Judge Dimbylow, the tribunal declared by consent that the claimant's contract of employment transferred from Birmingham City Council to Birmingham Children's Trust on 1 April 2018. By consent, the claim against Birmingham City Council was dismissed, and the claimant's application dated 10 January 2020 to amend the claim form was granted.
The tribunal refused and dismissed the respondents' applications for strike out, whether in whole or in part, and for a deposit order. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. The extract does not determine the merits of any remaining claims against Birmingham Children's Trust.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | By consent, the claim against Birmingham City Council was dismissed after the tribunal declared that the claimant's contract of employment had transferred to Birmingham Children's Trust on 1 April 2018. The extracted text does not identify the substantive head(s) of claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.