Case 1306490/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Sharon Webster v Mrs Ellen Evans t/a Café V — 2021
- Case reference
- 1306490/2019
- Decision date
- 26 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Butler
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Sharon Webster
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Sharon Webster's claims against Mrs Ellen Evans t/a Cafe V were heard remotely at Birmingham Employment Tribunal on 13-15 April 2021 before Employment Judge Mark Butler. The tribunal dismissed the claims of unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal / breach of contract (notice), and unauthorised deductions from wages.
The tribunal upheld the claim for unpaid annual leave and awarded £316.09 gross. It also upheld the claim for failure to provide a written statement of terms and conditions of employment and awarded an additional two weeks' gross pay of £295.56.
The total gross sum awarded was £611.65, subject to statutory deductions at source.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Wrongful dismissal / breach of contract (notice) was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid annual leave succeeded; gross award of £316.09. | Upheld | — | £316 |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed together with the notice claim and the unauthorised deductions claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of terms and conditions of employment; additional award of two weeks' gross pay, £295.56. No dedicated claim type is available in the taxonomy. | Upheld | — | £296 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £612
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.