Case 1306514/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Lister v Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 1306514/2024
- Decision date
- 20 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Connolly
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Lister
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge J Connolly sitting alone on 20 June 2025. The judgment records that, by consent, the tribunal determined that Mr E Lister was a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 at all times material to his claims.
The finding was made by reference to autism and autism in combination with features consistent with a mild borderline personality disorder. No liability findings, dismissal findings, or remedy awards are recorded in this judgment beyond that preliminary disability-status determination.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only. By consent, the tribunal found that the claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010 at all times material to his claims, by reason of autism and autism in combination with features consistent with a mild borderline personality disorder. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.