Case 1306550/2020 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Mr G Thomas, Director — 2020
- Case reference
- 1306550/2020
- Decision date
- 19 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Richardson Signed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs S Young's complaint of unlawful deduction from wages was found well founded. The tribunal recorded that she worked 30 hours a week at £10 per hour. Annex A set out the calculation for the period from 31 March 2020 to 19 May 2020, including holiday pay and overtime, and applied deductions for 80% of wages paid for Good Friday and Easter Monday and for two cheques sent and held by the claimant.
The tribunal ordered Stairplan Limited to pay £602.86. Annex A recorded that £2.86 remained owed for holiday pay and that there was an award under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 of two weeks' gross pay at £300 per week, making £600, with a grand total of £602.86.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal upheld the unlawful deduction from wages complaint and ordered payment of £602.86 in total. Annex A records a residual holiday pay balance of £2.86 and a separate award under section 38 Employment Act 2002 of £600. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £603
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.