Case 1306592/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Stanley v Serbus Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1306592/2020
- Decision date
- 2 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Woffenden Representation
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Stanley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Midlands West on 1 and 2 September 2022 before Employment Judge Woffenden. The claimant was Miss J Stanley and the respondent was Serbus Limited. The judgment records that the claimant was represented in person and the respondent by Ms R Kirk, solicitor.
The only substantive decision recorded in the written judgment is that the claimant was not disabled for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010. On that basis, her complaint of direct disability discrimination was dismissed.
The note to the judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The extracted text therefore records the outcome and the disability finding, but does not set out any fuller reasoning beyond the tribunal's conclusion.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant was not disabled for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 and that her complaint of direct disability discrimination was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.