Case 1306666/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Evans v InMoment Inc (Sara Griffiths) and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 1306666/2020
- Decision date
- 29 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Meichen
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr R Evans
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 2 August 2023, the tribunal gave Mr R Evans an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with the tribunal's order of 3 September 2021 and for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Meichen struck out the claim on 29 December 2023. The extracted reasons do not record any substantive determination of the underlying employment claim or any monetary award, only the procedural disposal by strike-out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The reasons do not restate the substantive claim, but the case listing category is unlawful deduction from wages. The tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant had not complied with the order of 3 September 2021, had not actively pursued the case, and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing after the letter of 2 August 2023. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.