Case 1306671/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Gibson Cabrero v Damascena Harborne Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1306671/2020
- Decision date
- 30 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Connolly
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Gibson Cabrero
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr M Gibson Cabrero brought a claim against Damascena Harborne Limited for unauthorised deductions from wages. At the hearing on 30 April 2021 before Employment Judge Connolly, sitting alone by CVP, the respondent's name was amended by consent to Damascena Harborne Limited.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages in respect of the period 1 to 18 May 2020 inclusive. The judgment records no additional claims or findings beyond the wage deduction issue.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £506.67 gross. No separate remedy breakdown, interest award, or written reasons were provided in the judgment record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages for the period 1-18 May 2020 inclusive and ordered payment of the gross sum. | Upheld | — | £507 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £507
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.