Case 1306673/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Harrison v K&F Contracting Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1306673/2020
- Decision date
- 4 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Harrison
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 23 August 2023, the Tribunal gave Mr R Harrison an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why his claim should not be struck out. The stated bases were that he had not complied with the Tribunal's orders dated 7 October 2022 and 30 November 2022, and that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
Employment Judge Broughton therefore struck out the claim on 4 January 2024. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying employment claims and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not adjudicate the underlying substantive claims; it strikes the claim out because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's orders dated 7 October 2022 and 30 November 2022 and did not actively pursue the case. By letter dated 23 August 2023, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing, but no sufficient representations or hearing request was made. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.