Case 1306730/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. Cole, Lay representative v Browns Lane Garage Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1306730/2020
- Decision date
- 19 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. Cole, Lay representative
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Fisher claimed notice pay and redundancy pay after being made redundant on 30 June 2020. The respondent argued that his employment only began in 2016, but the tribunal accepted his evidence and documents showing work at the garage from September 1999, including payslips and a P60, and found that his employment had continued throughout the change in ownership.
The tribunal found that after the original owner died the garage continued to trade, Mr Fisher continued working and being paid, and there was no P45 or notice that his employment had ended. It held that his employment had been taken on by the executor of the estate and that section 218(4) ERA 1996 did not break continuity. It also found that the 30 April 2016 sale agreement transferred the business and employees, including Mr Fisher, to Browns Lane Garage Limited under TUPE, and that the 27 May 2016 signed salary summary was only a variation of terms rather than a new start date.
On that basis, the tribunal held that by June 2020 Mr Fisher had 20 years' service with the respondent. Applying the redundancy calculation in section 162 ERA 1996, it found that he was entitled to £11,550 in redundancy pay. Because the respondent had already paid £2,520, the outstanding balance was £9,030, which the tribunal awarded.
The tribunal also accepted Mr Fisher's evidence that he had not been paid notice pay. Applying section 86 ERA 1996, it held that his notice period was 12 weeks and calculated notice pay at £5,040 gross. The total award was £14,070.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that Mr Fisher had continuous employment from September 1999 to June 2020, so his redundancy payment had to be calculated by reference to 20 years' service rather than 2016. It found an entitlement of £11,550, noted that £2,520 had already been paid, and awarded the £9,030 shortfall. | Upheld | — | £9,030 |
| Breach of contract | This was the claimant's notice pay claim. The tribunal held that he was entitled to 12 weeks' notice under section 86 ERA 1996 and awarded £5,040 gross, with the respondent to account for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £5,040 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,070
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.86 ERA 1996
- s.162 ERA 1996
- s.218 ERA 1996
- s.218(4) ERA 1996
- Farrow v Wilson 1869 LR CP 744
- TUPE Regulations 2006
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.