Case 1306748/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K W Michaelewicz v Auria Solutions Limited PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2020
- Case reference
- 1306748/2019
- Decision date
- 18 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K W Michaelewicz
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Jeram sitting alone at Nottingham on 18 February 2020. The judgment records that the claimant, Ms K W Michaelewicz, was represented by Ms J Spencer and the respondent, Auria Solutions Limited, by Ms E Hewitt.
The tribunal dealt only with the claimant’s notice pay and redundancy pay claims. Both were withdrawn, and the judgment states that they were dismissed on withdrawal.
The judgment also records that the remaining claims of automatic unfair dismissal and pregnancy discrimination were unaffected by this decision and would proceed to a final hearing. No findings were made on the merits of those remaining claims, and no remedy was awarded in this preliminary decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay was withdrawn and dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | Claim for redundancy pay was withdrawn and dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.