Case 1306756/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Lovegrove v Wayne Johnson — 2020
- Case reference
- 1306756/2019
- Decision date
- 11 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gaskell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Lovegrove
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Gaskell found that the respondent, Wayne Johnson, had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss D Lovegrove's wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,500, described in the judgment as a gross/net sum and also identified as a gross figure.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £600 gross. No other claims, legal reasoning, or additional remedy components are set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment recorded that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,500 gross/net sum (described as a gross figure). | Upheld | — | £1,500 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment recorded that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £600 gross figure. | Upheld | — | £600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,100
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.