Case 1306765/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Moseley v John Craddock Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1306765/2020
- Decision date
- 24 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Moseley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs R Moseley brought a disability discrimination claim against John Craddock Limited. On 24 May 2021 Employment Judge Miller held that the claim had been presented more than three months after the last act of alleged discrimination.
The tribunal extended time to 28 July 2020 for the claimant to bring the claim relating to her dismissal on 17 March 2021, finding that it was just and equitable to do so. The judgment did not decide whether the claim succeeded on its merits.
The tribunal also recorded that it would be for the final hearing tribunal to decide whether any alleged acts before the dismissal formed part of conduct extending over a period under section 123 Equality Act 2010.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal held the disability discrimination claim was presented more than three months after the last act of alleged discrimination. It extended time to 28 July 2020 for the claimant to bring the claim relating to her dismissal on 17 March 2021 as it was just and equitable to do so; the judgment did not determine the merits of the discrimination allegations. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 123 Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.