Case 1306773/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P J West v Cottage Furniture Limited (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1306773/2020
- Decision date
- 13 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Meichen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P J West
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 13 March 2023, the Tribunal gave Mr P J West an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that he did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The extracted judgment does not record any substantive determination of liability on the merits, nor does it set out any remedy award.
The case was before Employment Judge Meichen, and the judgment is dated 20 April 2023. The extracted text does not identify any lay members.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records only that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued. The specific heads of claim are taken from the case listing context, not from the judgment text itself. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records only that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued. The specific heads of claim are taken from the case listing context, not from the judgment text itself. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records only that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued. The specific heads of claim are taken from the case listing context, not from the judgment text itself. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.