Case 1306848/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Singh v Jaguar Land Rover Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1306848/2020
- Decision date
- 9 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Britton Appearances
- Venue
- by CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Singh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the claims were not presented within the relevant time limits. For the unfair dismissal claim, it found that it was not reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented within the time limit and that it was presented within a further reasonable period.
For the disability discrimination claim, which the judgment states related only to the claimant's dismissal, the Tribunal found that it was just and equitable to extend time. On that basis, the Tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to consider the claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment determined only that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to consider the unfair dismissal claim despite it being presented outside the relevant time limit; it did not decide the merits of the claim. | Other | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment determined only that it was just and equitable to extend time for the disability discrimination claim relating to dismissal; it did not decide the merits of the claim. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- reasonably practicable
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.