Case 1306851/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Vava v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1306851/2020
- Decision date
- 1 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Battisby
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Vava
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim after giving the claimant an opportunity, by letter dated 22 April 2023, to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out.
The stated reasons were that the claim had not been actively pursued and that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 26 January 2023. The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The hearing listed for 18 to 21 September 2023 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The gov.uk listing identifies race discrimination; the judgment itself states only that the claim is struck out. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The gov.uk listing identifies unfair dismissal; the judgment itself states only that the claim is struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The gov.uk listing identifies Working Time Regulations; the judgment itself states only that the claim is struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.