Case 1306935/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Respondent: Mr N Phillips Fernhill Health War Memorial Club JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. By a letter dated 13 March 2024 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity lo make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because • the claimant had not complied with the Order of the Tribunal dated 26 October 2023. • The claimant has failed to respond to the Tribunal’s letter dated 20 March 2024 • it has not been actively pursued. 2. The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The claim is therefore struck out. Employment Judge Childe Dated: 19 April 2024 v Mr N Phillips Fernhill Health War Memorial Club — 2024
- Case reference
- 1306935/2023
- Decision date
- 19 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Childe Dated
Parties
2 namedRespondent: Mr N Phillips Fernhill Health War Memorial Club JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. By a letter dated 13 March 2024 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity lo make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because • the claimant had not complied with the Order of the Tribunal dated 26 October 2023. • The claimant has failed to respond to the Tribunal’s letter dated 20 March 2024 • it has not been actively pursued. 2. The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The claim is therefore struck out. Employment Judge Childe Dated: 19 April 2024
Claims brought
1 categoryOutcomes per claim are extracted in a second pass and are not yet published on this page.
Source document
Primary recordThe full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.