Case 1306952/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the First v Mr. Zain Malik - Solicitor The Second respondent was dismissed from the proceedings by separate — 2020
- Case reference
- 1306952/2019
- Decision date
- 4 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Algazy QC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a consent judgment in case numbers 1306952/2019, 1307016/2019 and 1307067/2019 heard before Employment Judge Algazy QC on 21-24 July and 1 September 2020. The first respondent accepted that the claimants were unfairly dismissed, and the tribunal made a declaration to that effect. The second respondent had been dismissed from the proceedings by separate judgment.
The tribunal then ordered the first respondent to pay itemised sums to each claimant. Mrs Blackford was awarded a basic award of £3,694.50, notice pay of £1,773.36 gross, an unauthorised deduction of wages of £591.12 gross, and loss of earnings of £2,216.70. Miss Stevenson was awarded a basic award of £1,206.87, notice pay of £804.58 gross, an unauthorised deduction of wages of £747.11 gross, and loss of earnings of £3,448.20.
Miss Cornelius was awarded a basic award of £6,980.88, notice pay of £2,839.68 gross, loss of statutory rights of £500, an unauthorised deduction of wages of £1,102.75 gross, holiday pay of £118.32 gross, loss of earnings of £2,921.25, and loss of pension of £258.27. The judgment records these sums as agreed payments ordered by the tribunal, but it does not separate the non-basic items into distinct claim findings.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | By consent, the first respondent accepted that the claimants were unfairly dismissed and the tribunal made a declaration to that effect. The judgment then ordered itemised sums for each claimant, but it did not split the monetary award by separate claim head. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £29,204
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £11,882
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £17,321
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.