Mr D Gould v Clearabee Limited — 2020

Case reference: 1306987/2019
Decision date: 8 September 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Flood

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr D Gould

Respondent

Clearabee Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The case was heard by Employment Judge Flood sitting alone at Birmingham by CVP on 8 September 2020. The claimant, Mr D Gould, did not attend and did not send representation. The respondent, Clearabee Limited, was represented by Mr R Linton, a director.

The judgment states that the claimant's complaints of unlawful deduction of wages, breach of contract, and accrued holiday pay were not well founded. Each complaint was dismissed. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing, but no written reasons would follow unless requested within 14 days.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	The judgment grouped this with the claimant's other complaints and dismissed it as not well founded.	Dismissed	—	—
Breach of contract	The judgment grouped this with the claimant's other complaints and dismissed it as not well founded.	Dismissed	—	—
Holiday pay	Recorded in the judgment as a claim for accrued holiday pay and dismissed with the other complaints.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.